Words & Photos by Jared Erickson
Earlier this year, Fox released several new forks with updated dampers to match the feel of their rear shocks - including the Fox 36 with the GripX Damper we're reviewing. We were pretty stoked to see some innovation and new damper technology when they dropped, but how do we feel about them now that we've been using and abusing the fork for the better part of the last year? Tune in to find out!
Back in March, Liam and I were invited up to Fox HQ near Santa Cruz, CA for a press event where Fox introduced us to a bunch of new products and asked us to put them through the wringer. I showed up with my Forbidden Druid, and swapped my RockShox Lyrik Ultimate with a 160mm Fox 36 with the GripX damper. The Fox 36 has been around for ages in one guise or another and this latest version with the GripX promised more versatility than ever. How would it stack up against the famous Grip2 damper that's been around for years as well as other forks that we've become accustomed to?
Since then, I've switched bikes but the 36 has remained with me and now has a happy forever home on my Yeti SB140 Lunch Ride. Paired with the Float X rear shock, the performance of the 36 seems to match the support that the Float X provides, and I do believe that was the intention that Fox set out with when developing these new dampers. With all that said, lets see how the cookie crumbles in the real world.
Getting a fork dialed in can be quite simple, or it can be a dizzying prospect of twisting knobs and pressurizing different air chambers until you are just over it and settle for subpar performance. Thankfully, having used Fox products for years now, I am quite familiar with the setup process and the GripX is as easy as ever to get dialed in.
I typically get along with Fox's recommended settings for my riding weight and so that is where I will normally start on a new fork - with the exception of running compression a tad more open than suggested. I'll occasionally add a click or two of HSC when tackling more high speed technical trails or trails with bigger hits so I have a little more support throughout the travel. Aside from that, I've added an extra volume spacer to help ramp up the fork a bit through the travel and that's about it.
Modern forks are impressive in many ways, durability being one of them. Most high end forks these days are more than willing to take a thrashing and come back for more, and this 36 I've been testing has been no exception. It's been the subject of plenty of abuse, from local trails of all types, bike parks, and the steep and rooty chutes in Santa Cruz to the rocky and, well, rocky trails in southern Utah.
After what was likely generously exceeding the service interval, the fork begun to weep a tiny bit of oil out of the damper side wiper seal, which I took as my sign to give this fork some love and perform a lower leg service. Thankfully, these forks are extremely easy to service and within an hour it was as good as new, and hasn't leaked since. I think it's a testament to modern engineering that a quick service is all it takes to bring a fork back to new after essentially countless hours of abuse.
The Fox 36 might very well be the gold standard (no kashima pun intended) for all mountain performance and versatility. The ability to firm up the compression on the fork for increased efficiency and out of the saddle pedaling efforts has previously been relegated to XC oriented forks, and as a result, downhill performance was compromised. With the GripX, that compromise is now a thing of the past. The compression lever isn't quite intended to be a full on "lockout" as it doesn't completely lock the fork in place, but it will firm it up enough for it to make a difference when efficiency is on the mind.
Evaluating the performance of a suspension fork can be challenging when everything is as refined and perfected as they are these days. With that said, this fork is extremely capable and functions very well on everything from mellow trails to challenging enduro and DH style tracks, especially for its 160mm of travel. Most, if not all riders should easily be able to find a sweet spot in the range of adjustments that suits their needs and preferences.
On the trail, I have found the fork to have a solid blend of suppleness and support when the going gets rough. I haven't experienced any instances where the fork is diving or putting me in an awkward position on the trail. The chassis is plenty stiff for this travel segment and you really can only notice any sort of flex when you are getting the bike in over its head on extremely gnarly tracks and very heavy compressions. If you're riding stuff like that consistently, I'd say you'd be better off on a bike with more travel and would be better suited to equipping a Fox 38 or RockShox ZEB instead of the all mountain focused 36.
One thing I've found is that after a handful of hard rides, small bump performance can be slightly affected once pressure builds up in the lower legs, but thankfully you can quickly and easily restore that sweet small bump sensitivity by utilizing the lower leg bleeders. Some say these are a gimmick, and for those naysayers I say nay in return.
If you have a bike with 150mm or 160mm of front travel, you probably have a few forks on the mind that suit your needs, this Fox 36 with the GripX being one of them. Other forks and dampers may have more of an emphasis on all out downhill performance, yet this particular 36 takes the cake for pure versatility and doesn't sacrifice much if anything in terms of downhill performance in my book. In my experience, this fork feels like the best version of having your cake and eating it too.